August 22, 2018
Alberta is looking to recreate the building boom spreading along the U.S. Gulf Coast, where inexpensive natural gas generated billions of dollars in investment by petrochemical companies.
The adoption by drillers of fracking technology to unlock oil and gas from shale rock expanded U.S. production dramatically starting a decade ago. That abundance has generated $194 billion since 2010 in announced capital investment to build or expand U.S. chemical plants that use gas to make plastics, fertilizer and fuel, the American Chemistry Council told Reuters.
Alberta hopes to do the same thing, turning prices that are about one-third those at the U.S. Gulf Coast into a competitive advantage to attract petrochemical companies. Such investment would provide a badly needed market for oil and gas within the landlocked province, where energy companies struggle to reach buyers farther away.
Alberta in 2016 launched incentives to diversify its oil-based economy. Two projects, including Inter Pipeline Ltd’s planned $3.5 billion petrochemical plant near Edmonton, have been approved to share $500 million in royalty credits.
Alberta solicited bids for a second subsidy round in June.
“They’re getting all kinds of expressions of interests,” David Podruzny, vice-president of business and economics at the Chemical Industry Association of Canada, said in an interview with Reuters.
As attractive as cheap gas is, skeptics say Alberta’s incentives fall short of those in the U.S. Gulf, and the province also has the disadvantages of higher costs and inadequate infrastructure.
But companies are chasing opportunities even without government help.
CF Industries Holdings Inc is boosting ammonia fertilizer production by 150,000 short tons annually at its Medicine Hat, Alberta, plant starting later this year. The lower cost allows it to ship farther than usual, to farmers in the corn-growing U.S. state of Iowa.
“At times it’s free,” Bert Frost, CF’s senior vice-president of sales, of Alberta’s gas, told Reuters. “We have the lowest-cost gas in the world today.”
Fertilizer producer Nutrien Ltd has begun analyzing a potential expansion in Alberta, Chief Executive Chuck Magro told Reuters. He expects the abundance of cheap gas to persist, even if the $40 billion LNG Canada terminal for liquefied natural gas is built in coming years, creating a new export outlet.
“Our analysis is you would need to build several (LNG terminals) before we would see much higher gas prices,” he said in an interview this month. “I’m quite bearish for natural gas in Western Canada for the foreseeable future.”
Methanex Corp, which makes a liquid chemical called methanol, is considering a second plant in Medicine Hat, Paul Daoust, vice-president for North America, told Reuters.
Canada is the world’s fifth-largest gas producer, but much of the gas it used to sell into the Northeastern United States has been displaced by expanding U.S. supplies.
An incentive program spanning up to a decade and competitive with what is available along the U.S. Gulf Coast is necessary to offset Alberta’s higher capital costs, said Lori Kent, executive director of Resource Diversification Council.
Insufficient pipeline infrastructure is also holding the province back, said John Rogers, senior vice-president at credit ratings agency Moody’s.
Low prices have been a hardship for gas producers, and prolonged weakness could force them to reduce supplies.
Crew Energy Inc has already shut in dry gas wells this year, Chief Executive Dale Shwed, told Reuters.
“If companies are not going to make money producing gas and selling it, they’re not going to drill for it,” Shwed said.