IPP&T Magazine Online
News

Ottawa should deliver carbon backstop cash to citizens in rogue provinces: report


October 17, 2018  


Print this page

According to a new report from the C.D. Howe Institute, Ottawa should rebate revenues from its carbon pricing backstop directly to citizens in non-compliant provinces that reject its plan.

In The Rocky Road to Canada-wide Carbon Pricing, author Tracy Snoddon argues that this option for returning backstop cash ensures government accountability is fair and flexible.

As the deadline for the federal government’s carbon pricing plan approaches, several provinces and territories are not yet in compliance with its requirements. Effective January 1, 2019, Ottawa intends to implement a minimum carbon price backstop in any non-compliant province or territory and promises to return the revenues to the jurisdiction where they are collected.

The choice of how to do this is, however, still in flux.

“The politics of carbon pricing may have changed, but the climate change challenge has not,” says Snoddon. “As some provinces take a step back from carbon pricing, the federal government’s minimum-price backstop, and how it is deployed, is more important than ever.”

Ottawa has plenty of options for returning backstop revenues including cash grants to provincial and territorial governments, targeted federal spending, or equal per-capita rebates to the jurisdiction’s residents. Backstop revenues will be sizeable.

As an example, the author conservatively estimates Ottawa would raise $2.8 billion in 2019 if the backstop was implemented in Ontario, Saskatchewan, New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Prince Edward Island. In Saskatchewan, for instance, estimated backstop revenues for 2019 translate into $459 per person and would be sufficient to lower the provincial sales tax rate in the province from 6 to 4.5 per cent. In Ontario backstop revenues could put an estimated $133 per person in pockets of Ontarians, or $300 for the average household.

The report findings include:

  • In provinces and territories that request the backstop, the author recommends disbursing revenues in accordance with the provincial government’s wishes.
  • In a non-compliant province or territory, the author recommends Ottawa impose the backstop, but return the revenues as an equal per-capita rebate to residents. The per-capita rebate approach is preferable for several reasons; it minimizes intrusion in provincial fiscal matters, ensures government accountability, and helps to avoid returning the revenues in an arbitrary way.
  • Rebating revenues to individuals reinforces the environmental, rather than revenue generation, purpose of carbon-pricing, which may reduce the risk of a successful future constitutional challenge to the backstop.
  • A per-capita rebate addresses the distributional impacts from carbon pricing. Since rebates are allocated on a per-capita basis, a poor household will receive more, as a share of household income, than a household of a similar size.

Read the full report


Print this page

Related


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*